Oliver Sacks' Anthropologist on Mars was published in February of 1995, and Sophie was born one month later. By that summer, she had been diagnosed with infantile spasms and we had begun the journey that would take us to proverbial other planets. I read Sacks' book with the same relish that I'd read his previous ones, but this time I felt he was speaking directly to me.
I lived in New York City in the nineties, not far from where Dr. Sacks
practiced. I had looked up his address and telephone number in the phone book. I
thought he sat behind a great wooden desk with a small light that illuminated not only the
paper in front of him but also the consciousness of the people about whom he wrote. I
fantasized about calling him and imagined we’d have a conversation about Sophie
– not so much about stopping her seizures and making her normal but rather
about her integrity as a human being despite whatever peculiarity or
abnormality she possessed. I never called Dr. Sacks, but I did read everything
he wrote. I also sat in a chair in the third row from the stage where he stood
reading aloud from his work many years later in Los Angeles. Because his words
had so deeply resonated with me, sustained me, really, during some of my
darkest days as I wrestled with Sophie’s disability, her seizures, her
inability to speak or care for herself, her identity and mine, I felt an enormous impulse to jump on
the stage and embrace him. I didn’t do that, either.
This morning, I woke to the news that Dr. Sacks had died. I
understand that some disability activists have criticized him for exploiting
his patients’ disabilities in the interest of narrative. Scientists have
criticized him for emphasizing narrative over the clinical. More, though, have loved him and been illumined by his writing. It’s been more than
twenty years since I read An
Anthropologist on Mars, and while my daughter’s brain has remained
a mystery to the neurologists that have failed to help her clinically, her
integrity as a human being, reinforced in my own mind by the writing and life
of Dr. Sacks, is far more evident. I will miss knowing that Dr. Sacks’ light is
on, somewhere in the world, and am grateful for how he shed it on Sophie and
me.
This is just incredibly beautiful, Elizabeth. It got me to thinking- we should all write love letters to those we love before they die. Shouldn't we? I know he would have loved reading this.
ReplyDeleteHe shed his light on me too. Thank you for this lovely reflection.
ReplyDeleteWonderful. Wonderful...
ReplyDeleteWhat a beautiful tribute.
ReplyDeleteThank you for this eloquent eulogy of a dear,unique person. It's hard to digest the fact, as you noted,that some actually criticized him. My son, a neuroscientist, also had the good fortune to hear him speak at a local university a few years ago.
ReplyDeleteThis is an utterly lovely tribute. I'm not all that familiar with his work, aside from a recent New Yorker article, but I am at least aware of his contributions to his field. Now even more so.
ReplyDeleteGoosebumps.
ReplyDeleteI have never read Dr Sacks, but I think one of these days I should.
ReplyDeleteyou know, he looks a bit like robin williams in that picture,
ReplyDelete